The Woman at the Well
Was no Ho’!
I consider this my
most important blog post of all of my entire writing career. I want to right a century's old wrong, a
very much wrong done to a HOLY woman. We've always heard her be called an immoral woman who was shacking up after having FIVE husbands. Who told us that? Think back, who taught us that
she was a whore. Nine times out of ten, our answer will be, my pastor, or a
Bible commentator, in other words, in most cases, it was a MAN who took this
HOLY woman and turned her into a whore for centuries. Let me tell you, if this were my daughter,
and she is GOD’s, I would be FLIPPIN’ mad about this.
First, let’s define
HOLY: Most people attribute holy as pure, perfect, and good, but the true
definition is “set apart.” That’s it! Now, GOD is true and pure and good, and set
apart as LORD of lords, Majestic above all, thus He is Holy . Likewise is Jesus. But, did you know that as a Christian, you are
holy regardless of the sins you keep falling into. You are set apart. Now, that we have that established, let’s
look at that poor woman at the well that men seemed to enjoy calling a ho'. She was alone there, wasn’t she in the middle of the day, when most outcasts would be subject to in order to keep them set apart from the highly respectable woman who gathered their water in the early morning. So, either she couldn’t make it early that morning, or, she needed more than she
got earlier and went back for a refill. Maybe she spilled her early morning jar
of water. Regardless of why she was
there, it was planned by GOD to have her there, set apart.
She would be the very
first woman to hear Jesus proclaim to be The Messiah. He did NOT tell a man, he told a
woman. Likewise, a woman was the first to see Jesus risen, another woman who was unfairly labeled a woman of ill-repute, just because she was the victim of several demons and shunned by all men. I am an outcast, tossed away by several people, unwanted, then a woman scorned, so, I’m going to try
and keep my bias against men out of this.
Okay, well, maybe I will throw in a few well-deserved shots! The first Bible commentators were MEN. Most pastors are MEN. Most of all clergy through out Christendom were
MEN. Therefore, it was a man who put
that label on both of them. I’m going to have you to go back and read John 4, and I
will ask you a few questions. I’ll wait
until you finish.
Okay, it’s quiz
time.
Not a single one of
those answers will you find in that section of John 4 or anywhere else in the
Bible, and yet, all those men have labeled her a whore. That ticks me off to the point that I get in trouble with my children, because I run to her defense, loudly. She could have been 75. She could have been barren, thus shunned by
her community, labeled as cursed; thus, the reason for the five husbands. If
she was unable to bear children, she would have been tossed out onto the
street, because back then, men counted a woman’s worth by the usage of her womb
and other parts that they enjoyed, along with the culinary skills which ranked
last to them. .
Divorce was not so
common, but definitely an option, according to Jesus, because GOD knew how hard
were men’s hearts. She wasn’t really a
Jew, she was an Israelite, but not from the southern kingdom, but a mix of what was left of the northern kingdom and foreigners that the Assyrian Empire mixed in after they conquered the ten rebelling tribes. The Assyrian empire conquered the northern kingdom of Israel in 722
BC. Most of the Israelites from the ten
tribes were hauled off as slaves, while some were left to procreate with some
Assyrian peasants brought there to keep the land alive. Therefore, the lower class Assyrians had
their way with the lower class Israelite women, henceforth, you have a sect of half pagan half Jews hated by the thoroughbred Jews, as if they were any better.
We have NO idea what she was wearing, so assuming
she was scantily clad, as I’ve seen in some productions, all decked out in bling,
is again, a MAN’s interpretation and poetic license. I think their license needs to be revoked who
drew her that way.
Tell me, how many
women and men do you think “shacked-up” in Jesus’s day? Not too many, I would think. So, to put her in 20th century
shoes and clothing, calling her a whore is taking the Bible out of historical
context on a whole new level. Here is a question
you may want to ask yourself. How many women were adept in theological studies
back then? How did she know what the
Jews believed about Abraham’s well and worship, as opposed to her own people?
How did she know that a Messiah would come, what he would look like, and what to
expect of him? How did she know the Messiah would even accept the hated Samaritans? How many women in the oldest female profession do you
know that know Scripture?
Now, let’s look at the
obvious. If GOD is Sovereign over all
the earth, and He does whatever He pleases, then He arranged for HER and her
only to be there to hear what no man had ever heard to date. Jesus chose this woman to be
the very first one to hear those glorious words, “I am he.” (as in the Messiah) She was likely a servant to some man, or his
concubine by force, against her own will. Instead of passing “it” around voluntarily, she
was likely passed around and raped, forced to live a life all women hate. Women
did not have a great deal of opportunities in the industrial workplace then. If
they didn’t own property, she couldn’t sell her wares. She would have had to “rent” herself out if she wanted food and shelter.
Maybe she was widowed
five times? What was the life span of a
man back then? What about men in battle? Maybe both, she was widowed and toss
out on her fanny unfairly. Maybe she was
living with a brother-in-law who took her in, or a son-in-law, or even her own
son. Therefore, she would have been
living under a roof owned by a man who was not her husband, and subject to his
conditions, and we all know what conditions a man likes to enslave a woman, in
their fantasies, even if they never admit it.
So, this darling lady, who knew her place with Jews, particularly men, and who generously drew out water for a stranger, was
chosen not only to be the first missionary, but the first one to know for sure
that the Messiah had come. One last
question I want to ask you. How many women of ill-repute would have the audacity to go into a town square market-place and announce the arrival
of the Messiah, insisting that they follow her? None, I dare say, and none
would believe and follow her. “Professional” women back then had no credibility, and were often forced to be silent in public and hiding in alley-ways, until there were "picked" bye a man to please him, sometimes for free. They surely would address a man
or a marketplace full of them. Hence, this
woman had some credence, or she would have been ignored or scorned.
Listen people, we do a
great disservice when we look at anything in the Bible with 21st
Century glasses and then impose our views and opinions and own personal history
into the Bible and refer to it as Scripture. The reason there are so many
translation and interpretations is because man has decided that A really means
B, and C really means D. Maybe GOD wants
us to read, A B C D, in chronological order as written and give the credit as
the letter that they truly are, and not assumed that they are other letters in
disguise.
The Remnant takes the
Bible at its word, and we don’t’ inject our assumptions or flawed human
philosophy into it. We learn it chronologically, and we aren’t trying to build a
conglomerate corporation disguised under the title of “evangelism.” We live like the Apostles did, walking the
Gospel out to the world, not just talking it. We seek GOD and trust Him to bring
to us the ones He wants us to minister to, to love on, to help find healing
from the black eye the church yard bullies gave them. If that makes me a heretic in the church playground,
well then so be it. I find that a
compliment, because Jesus was crucified by the “church” people for being a
heretic in their eyes, only.
How grateful I am,
that he and John-the-Baptist stood up for the sinners and the tax collectors as
people who needed healing, not accusing, or finger pointing into a social class
of :throw-a-ways.’ I’ve been a throw-away, by MEN, so I know that pain, and so
much for keeping my personal bias against men out of this blog, you didn't expect that I would, did you?